Conservation vs Social Welfare

Conservation vs Social Welfare, Which one has the priority to be supported by the Korean Government?

This is obvious that the government should support social welfare priorly. This is one big stupid question. Although I know how important the conservations are, but there's no use if people can't live their own life happily and have the conservations safe. The government is using the taxes they got from the civilians to support conservation. People work really hard to make those money and pay taxes. If the government considers conservation priorly, there is no point of people working hard. It won't feel great to make money which is not for them and just for those stupid buildings and statues. The money comes from peoples pocket and therefore it should be used for the people. I believe that the government should consider more of social welfares than the conservations